Twee versies van Jeremia en een gereformeerde visie op de Schrift

Samenvatting

In accordance with scholarly consensus, but against the prevailing opinion of Reformed
exegetes, this article argues that the LXX-version of the book of Jeremiah has relative
historical priority over its Masoretic version. The authors demonstrate that this position is consistent with a Reformed doctrine of Scripture under the following conditions: if the the inspiration of Scripture includes redaction processes, the diversity of
voices of Scripture are accepted, and canonical authority does not exclude a complicated
canonization process.